Kiowa vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Kiowa
Navajo
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Kiowa
Navajo
23.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,981,337 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472 and weighted average of 23.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,292,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 30.5%, a difference of 28.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa | Navajo |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 50.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.7% | 98.2% |
Mean | 27.7% | 40.4% |
Median | 25.3% | 37.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.1% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.2% | 52.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 30.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 22.4% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Navajo by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Dominican (23.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 0.54%), Apache (23.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Central American Indian (22.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 3.7%), Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 9.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |