Polish vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Polish
Icelander
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Poles
Icelanders
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,484,152 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,122,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 9.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Icelander |
Minimum | 1.0% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 30.0% |
Range | 43.4% | 26.2% |
Mean | 14.9% | 15.0% |
Median | 13.0% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 7.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Poles by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |