Pennsylvania German vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Icelander
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Icelanders
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,555,284 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,122,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 13.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Icelander |
Minimum | 4.4% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 62.7% | 30.0% |
Range | 58.4% | 26.2% |
Mean | 20.9% | 15.0% |
Median | 17.7% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 7.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |