Norwegian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from South Central Asia
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 514,648,663 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,235,402 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.481 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 4.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 3.9% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 81.0% | 26.1% |
Range | 77.1% | 24.8% |
Mean | 15.5% | 9.3% |
Median | 13.0% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bhutanese (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |