New Zealander vs Spanish American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Spanish American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Spanish American Indians
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Spanish American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,229,490 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,039,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 0.67%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 3.9% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.0% |
Range | 96.1% | 73.5% |
Mean | 27.1% | 26.4% |
Median | 21.3% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.7% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Spanish American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are European (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |