Native Hawaiian vs Jordanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Jordanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Jordanians
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Jordanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,828,170 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,392,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Jordanian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 30.4% | 39.7% |
Range | 28.2% | 36.8% |
Mean | 12.6% | 11.8% |
Median | 11.9% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Jordanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |