Moroccan vs Norwegian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Moroccan
Norwegian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Moroccans
Norwegians
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
5.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Norwegian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,157,995 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,210,620 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 34.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Norwegian |
Minimum | 4.6% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 70.0% |
Range | 62.1% | 68.4% |
Mean | 23.3% | 14.7% |
Median | 17.9% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 15.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Japanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (17.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Osage (17.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Sierra Leonean (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Panamanian (17.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 3.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 0.51%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |