Mongolian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from Northern Africa
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,209,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,660,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 0.58% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 23.4% | 30.2% |
Range | 22.8% | 28.1% |
Mean | 8.0% | 11.2% |
Median | 7.5% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |