Menominee vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Menominee
Zimbabwean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Menominee
Zimbabweans
25.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Menominee vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,532,886 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 25.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,044,520 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 74.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Menominee | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 9.0% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 87.5% | 29.1% |
Range | 78.5% | 28.8% |
Mean | 29.7% | 11.0% |
Median | 24.1% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.2% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.6% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.1% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Menominee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 0.70%), Black/African American (24.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |