Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Taiwan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Taiwan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Taiwan
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Taiwan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,598,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,090,597 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 8.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Taiwan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 27.5% | 21.4% |
Range | 26.5% | 19.9% |
Mean | 11.1% | 8.6% |
Median | 9.8% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 10.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Taiwan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.80%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.76%), Chinese (10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |