Latvian vs Danish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Danish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Danes
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Danish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,618,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,673,857 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Danish |
Minimum | 0.50% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 31.3% | 50.0% |
Range | 30.8% | 48.6% |
Mean | 10.2% | 13.5% |
Median | 9.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 15.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Danes by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |