Latvian vs Czech Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Czech
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Czechs
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Czech Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,650,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,408,527 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%.
![Latvian vs Czech Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/poverty/latvians-vs-czechs-poverty-chart.webp)
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Czech |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.93% |
Maximum | 52.6% | 34.6% |
Range | 50.7% | 33.7% |
Mean | 9.9% | 9.5% |
Median | 8.8% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 10.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Czechs by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |