Laotian vs Immigrants from Australia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Laotian
Immigrants from Australia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Laotians
Immigrants from Australia
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Immigrants from Australia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,876,805 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,453,715 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 0.83%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 12.6% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 64.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 52.3% | 96.5% |
| Mean | 22.3% | 28.1% |
| Median | 18.7% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.6% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 20.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Immigrants from Australia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Egypt (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (19.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Paraguayan (19.3%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |