Korean vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Sub-Saharan Africans
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,221,953 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 32.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 30.9% | 69.8% |
| Range | 30.3% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 20.8% |
| Median | 9.8% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Koreans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |