Italian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Italian
Immigrants from Lithuania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Italians
Immigrants from Lithuania
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 569,861,523 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,605,958 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Italian | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 9.7% |
Range | 98.5% | 7.8% |
Mean | 11.4% | 5.5% |
Median | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Immigrants from Lithuania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |