Israeli vs Soviet Union Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Israeli
Soviet Union
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Israelis
Soviet Union
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Soviet Union Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,502 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 1.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.6% | 96.7% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 20.7% |
| Median | 16.5% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 19.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Soviet Union by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |