Iranian vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Chinese
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,868,463 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 49.0% | 57.9% |
| Range | 45.8% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 11.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from China (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |