Barbadian vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Barbadian
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Barbadians
Chinese
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,240,511 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 22.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Barbadian | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 53.3% | 57.9% |
Range | 51.3% | 56.4% |
Mean | 15.9% | 11.9% |
Median | 13.4% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Carpatho Rusyn (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Germany (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Senegal (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Czechoslovakian (13.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
Belgians | 1.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.5% |
Czechs | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 13.5% |
Spanish | 1.0 /100 | #249 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |