Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Burmese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Burmese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Burmese
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Burmese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,574,773 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,334,774 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 0.63%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 10.5% | 11.5% |
| Range | 9.7% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 4.1% |
| Median | 3.8% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Burmese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |