Immigrants from Yemen vs Yup'ik Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Yup'ik
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Yup'ik
28.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Yup'ik Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,238,204 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 28.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,804,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 26.6%, a difference of 8.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Yup'ik |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 56.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 47.7% | 97.1% |
| Mean | 31.0% | 36.3% |
| Median | 26.2% | 30.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.3% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.3% | 42.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.9% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 25.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen and Yup'ik by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Colville (29.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |