Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Celtics
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,161,280 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 8.1%.
![Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Family Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-poverty/immigrants-from-uruguay-vs-celtics-family-poverty-chart.webp)
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Celtic |
Minimum | 5.8% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 12.2% | 97.2% |
Mean | 10.3% | 12.7% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from South America (9.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 19.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 9.4% |
German Russians | 19.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |