Guamanian/Chamorro vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Celtics
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,737,995 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 0.030%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.8% | 97.2% |
Mean | 13.1% | 12.7% |
Median | 8.0% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.1% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |