Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Sri Lankan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Sri Lankans
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,315,048 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.93%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 45.5% |
| Range | 11.5% | 43.2% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 10.8% |
| Median | 8.1% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |