Immigrants from Panama vs Osage Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Osage
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Osage
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Osage Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,994,048 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,772,722 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 3.1%.
![Immigrants from Panama vs Osage Family Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-poverty/immigrants-from-panama-vs-osage-family-poverty-chart.webp)
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Osage |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 19.8% | 24.4% |
Range | 17.9% | 23.6% |
Mean | 9.7% | 10.3% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama and Osage by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and American (9.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |