Immigrants from Norway vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,648,610 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,135,451 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 2.4%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Norway	Slavic
Minimum	2.9%	3.7%
Maximum	35.7%	100.0%
Range	32.8%	96.3%
Mean	13.0%	28.3%
Median	11.0%	17.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.4%	13.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.0%	34.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.6%	21.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.5%	26.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.3%	26.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Slavs by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Hungary (15.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kuwait (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Albanian (15.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Spain (15.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	92.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Tlingit-Haida	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Czechoslovakians	92.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.3%
Palestinians	91.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.1 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Canadians	90.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Brazil	90.3 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	90.2 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	88.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.5%
Welsh	88.3 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.5%
Peruvians	88.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Portuguese	87.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Icelanders	87.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%
Immigrants \| Spain	87.1 /100 \| #137	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	86.5 /100 \| #138	Excellent 15.6%
Albanians	86.5 /100 \| #139	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 15.6%
Slavs	84.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 15.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	84.1 /100 \| #142	Excellent 15.7%