Immigrants from North America vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Czechoslovakian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Czechoslovakians
11.3%
POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,172,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.80%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 3.8% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 27.8% |
Range | 96.2% | 27.5% |
Mean | 23.1% | 12.1% |
Median | 15.4% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Dutch (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Europeans | 97.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Cambodians | 96.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |