Immigrants from Micronesia vs Hmong Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Hmong
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Hmong
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Hmong Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,492,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 23.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,642,418 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 0.16%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Hmong |
Minimum | 5.4% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 53.4% |
Range | 48.7% | 49.1% |
Mean | 26.0% | 25.8% |
Median | 22.8% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.8% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.2% | 32.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Hmong by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |