Immigrants from Korea vs Maltese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Maltese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Maltese
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Maltese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,882,145 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,421,821 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Maltese |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 48.2% | 37.5% |
Range | 46.5% | 36.8% |
Mean | 11.1% | 10.4% |
Median | 9.6% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Maltese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |