Immigrants from Korea vs Latvian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Latvian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Latvians
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Latvian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,882,145 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,618,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 48.2% | 31.3% |
Range | 46.5% | 30.8% |
Mean | 11.1% | 10.2% |
Median | 9.6% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Latvians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |