Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Chinese
11.7%
POVERTY
87.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,974,563 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 23.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.47% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 37.3% | 26.1% |
Range | 36.8% | 22.7% |
Mean | 10.3% | 10.2% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |