Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Pakistan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Pakistan
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,846,172 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,475,243 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 0.69%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from Pakistan |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 21.0% |
Range | 42.8% | 19.6% |
Mean | 11.1% | 7.8% |
Median | 9.0% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 9.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Pakistan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |