Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Egypt Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Immigrants from Egypt
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Immigrants from Egypt
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
93.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Egypt Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,983,535 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,353,400 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.81%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Egypt |
Minimum | 4.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 37.3% | 47.8% |
Range | 33.0% | 46.7% |
Mean | 10.6% | 10.9% |
Median | 9.5% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Egypt by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Czechoslovakian (10.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |