Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from China
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,897,720 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 40.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.48% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 50.1% | 24.4% |
Range | 49.6% | 23.3% |
Mean | 18.8% | 12.0% |
Median | 17.8% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are American (18.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |