Immigrants from China vs Bolivian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Bolivian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Bolivians
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Bolivian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,445,495 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Bolivian |
Minimum | 7.4% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 62.7% |
Range | 25.9% | 61.1% |
Mean | 16.3% | 19.6% |
Median | 15.7% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Bolivians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |