Immigrants from China vs Asian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Asian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Asians
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Asian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,826,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,573,654 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.368 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Asian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.65% |
Maximum | 29.3% | 30.3% |
Range | 27.7% | 29.6% |
Mean | 11.7% | 11.2% |
Median | 11.0% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Asians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Russian (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |