Immigrants from Chile vs Soviet Union Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Soviet Union
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Soviet Union
11.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
65.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Soviet Union Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,329,449 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,471,584 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 3.6%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Soviet Union |
Minimum | 0.40% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 23.2% | 20.3% |
Range | 22.8% | 18.4% |
Mean | 8.5% | 8.3% |
Median | 8.8% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Soviet Union by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Arab (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Alsatian (11.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Pennsylvania German (11.4%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Brazilian (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Whites/Caucasians | 83.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 11.1% |
Brazilians | 83.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 11.1% |
Soviet Union | 83.1 /100 | #150 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 81.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 81.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 11.1% |
Lebanese | 81.6 /100 | #153 | Excellent 11.1% |
Armenians | 81.4 /100 | #154 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 80.4 /100 | #155 | Excellent 11.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 75.6 /100 | #156 | Good 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.2 /100 | #157 | Good 11.3% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 72.6 /100 | #158 | Good 11.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 70.4 /100 | #159 | Good 11.4% |
French Canadians | 69.5 /100 | #160 | Good 11.4% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.4 /100 | #161 | Good 11.4% |
Alsatians | 68.0 /100 | #162 | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 65.8 /100 | #163 | Good 11.5% |
Immigrants | Chile | 65.0 /100 | #164 | Good 11.5% |
Arabs | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 11.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 11.5% |
Kenyans | 60.2 /100 | #167 | Good 11.6% |