Immigrants from Chile vs Australian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Australian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Australians
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Australian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,927,645 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Australian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 98.2% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 25.7% | 31.8% |
| Median | 19.7% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 22.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 22.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Australians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |