Immigrants from Cameroon vs Ethiopian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cameroon
Ethiopian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cameroon
Ethiopians
19.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Ethiopian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,300,683 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cameroon and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.236 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,686,273 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.34%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cameroon | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 42.6% | 33.2% |
| Range | 41.5% | 28.4% |
| Mean | 17.7% | 18.6% |
| Median | 18.1% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cameroon and Ethiopians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cameroon are Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Ukrainian (19.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |