Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealander Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
New Zealander
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
New Zealanders
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
65.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealander Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,800,336 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | New Zealander |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 32.1% |
Range | 23.9% | 29.3% |
Mean | 10.2% | 9.6% |
Median | 9.4% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 10.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |