Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Luxembourger Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Luxembourger
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Luxembourgers
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
65.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Luxembourger Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,800,336 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 15.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 17.8% |
Range | 23.9% | 16.3% |
Mean | 10.2% | 6.7% |
Median | 9.4% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |