Immigrants from Bahamas vs New Zealander Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
New Zealander
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
New Zealanders
22.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs New Zealander Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,304,662 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,229,490 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 7.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | New Zealander |
Minimum | 1.1% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 64.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.5% | 96.1% |
Mean | 23.9% | 27.1% |
Median | 21.9% | 21.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.8% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 29.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 20.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 19.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from West Indies (22.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Caribbean (22.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Belizean (22.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Delaware (22.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |