Immigrants from Armenia vs Tsimshian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Armenia
Tsimshian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Armenia
Tsimshian
12.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Armenia vs Tsimshian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,715,591 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Armenia | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 8.5% |
| Maximum | 22.8% | 21.8% |
| Range | 21.6% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 13.7% |
| Median | 11.1% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia and Tsimshian by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Fijian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nicaraguan (12.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |