Icelander vs Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Icelander
Native Hawaiian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Icelanders
Native Hawaiians
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,122,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,090,370 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 1.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Native Hawaiian |
Minimum | 3.8% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 70.0% |
Range | 26.2% | 67.6% |
Mean | 15.0% | 17.7% |
Median | 13.5% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 22.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Native Hawaiians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.050%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |