French American Indian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
13.9%
POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,970,723 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,643,852 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.349 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 0.60%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French American Indian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.62% |
| Maximum | 29.6% | 27.1% |
| Range | 27.4% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 12.8% |
| Median | 14.7% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (13.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cuban (13.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Ghanaian (13.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Nicaraguan (13.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Laos (13.8%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Nicaraguan (13.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Ecuadorian (14.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Sudanese (14.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |