Filipino vs Immigrants from India Female Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Immigrants from India
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Immigrants from India
10.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Immigrants from India Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,106,597 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,627,117 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.509 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 10.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Immigrants from India |
Minimum | 2.2% | 0.46% |
Maximum | 18.6% | 17.9% |
Range | 16.4% | 17.5% |
Mean | 8.5% | 7.1% |
Median | 8.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from India by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 1.5%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (10.4%, a difference of 5.2%), Thai (10.5%, a difference of 5.9%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 6.7%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 11.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |