Ecuadorian vs Alaska Native Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Alaska Native
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Alaska Natives
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Alaska Native Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,108,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,710,212 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 3.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Alaska Native |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 20.5% | 98.7% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 21.3% |
| Median | 10.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 30.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Alaska Natives by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.86%), Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |