Eastern European vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Eastern European
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Creek
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,083,832 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.711 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 60.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Creek |
Minimum | 1.0% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
Range | 99.0% | 72.7% |
Mean | 15.5% | 31.3% |
Median | 9.0% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 40.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.8% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and Asian (13.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |