Dutch vs Carpatho Rusyn Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Dutch
Carpatho Rusyn
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Dutch
Carpatho Rusyns
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Carpatho Rusyn Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 533,855,440 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,411,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 0.74% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 63.2% |
Range | 99.3% | 59.5% |
Mean | 14.3% | 17.5% |
Median | 13.8% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 20.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Carpatho Rusyns by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (15.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |