Czech vs Immigrants from Western Europe Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Immigrants from Western Europe
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Immigrants from Western Europe
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
76.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Immigrants from Western Europe Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,241,585 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Immigrants from Western Europe |
| Minimum | 6.8% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 80.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 74.1% | 83.8% |
| Mean | 29.6% | 44.3% |
| Median | 25.3% | 31.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 59.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.7% | 37.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 28.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 28.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Europe by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.080%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |