Czechoslovakian vs South American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
South American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
South American Indians
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
MALE POVERTY
22.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs South American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,409,681 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,512,423 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 11.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 37.0% | 38.9% |
| Range | 36.8% | 36.5% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 12.8% |
| Median | 11.3% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Israeli (11.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Uruguay (11.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Hawaiian (11.4%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and Sierra Leonean (11.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 33.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 32.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 31.9 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.4% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 29.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.4% |
| Hawaiians | 28.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.4% |
| Israelis | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.5% |
| South American Indians | 22.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 19.1 /100 | #192 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 17.3 /100 | #193 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 16.1 /100 | #194 | Poor 11.6% |
| Arabs | 15.8 /100 | #195 | Poor 11.6% |
| Hmong | 15.8 /100 | #196 | Poor 11.6% |
| Delaware | 15.4 /100 | #197 | Poor 11.7% |
| Iraqis | 14.7 /100 | #198 | Poor 11.7% |